
Secure & Simple — Podcast for Consultants and vCISOs on Cybersecurity Governance and Compliance AI Agents vs. AI Agents: The Future of Security Operations | Interview with Monzy Merza
Mar 24, 2026
Monzy Merza, co-founder and CEO of Crogl and former security researcher, explains how attackers now deploy AI agents to run fast automated campaigns. He explores agent-vs-agent threats, AI SOC agents that enrich alerts and produce MITRE-based investigations, when humans must remain in the loop, shifting SecOps roles toward engineers, and practical governance and testing for agentic tools.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Large Enterprise Example Of AI SOC Investigation
- Crogl connects alerts to multiple incident management systems and data lakes, runs MITRE ATT&CK kill chain analysis and returns an investigation report.
- Monzy described a large enterprise with 100 analysts using Crogl to enrich alerts without analysts writing queries or remembering data schemas.
Phase Agent Adoption With Human Decision Gate
- Adopt agentic automation in phases: start with narrow use cases, let the system run autonomously while humans remain decision makers, then expand until alignment allows full autonomy.
- Monzy advised measuring alignment between machine recommendations and human decisions before granting full autonomy.
Humans Must Keep High Impact Decision Authority
- High-stakes operational decisions like accusing an insider or removing access will remain human-mediated due to legal, procedural and risk considerations.
- Monzy used insider-threat investigations and potential wrongful accusations to show why humans must verify AI findings before punitive actions.
