Blind review is often imperfect

Dan and James discuss a recent editorial which argues that double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity.

Links

• The editorial from Christopher Mebane: https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae046

Other links
Everything Hertz on Bluesky

• Dan on Bluesky
• James on Bluesky
• Everything Hertz on Bluesky

Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!

• $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
• $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month

Citation

Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2025, Jan 30). Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6XS29

Support Everything Hertz