Cato Podcast cover image

'Fake Judging' versus 'Judicial Engagement'

Cato Podcast

00:00

Introduction

Exploring the distinction between 'fake judging' and 'judicial engagement' in fulfilling the role of judges by analyzing facts, evidence, and constitutional language. The chapter emphasizes the importance of 'real judging' based on evidence for decisions on constitutionality, contrasting it with 'fake judging' that rationalizes government actions without evidence.

Play episode from 00:00
Transcript

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app