You might have heard that '95% of corporate AI pilots' are failing. It was one of the most widely cited AI statistics of 2025, parroted by media outlets everywhere. It helped trigger a Nasdaq selloff and became a pillar of the case that 'AI is overhyped'. The problem: it's 100% wrong. And not by accident either.
If you carefully read the underlying report, ostensibly from MIT, you find the data point in the opposite direction.
But that was all buried, with the authors instead torturing the results to tell a very different narrative. Why?
Well, the research likely came with a hidden commercial agenda from the start.
Learn more, video, and full transcript: https://80k.info/mit-ai-study
Today Rob Wiblin breaks down how an opaque, conflicted, barely-scrutinised report managed to attract the MIT label, move markets and have a vast impact on global opinion about AI.
This episode was recorded on February 13, 2026.
Chapters:
• The myth (00:00)
• The math was totally wrong (00:52)
• The absurd bar for success (01:46)
• The study ignores its own findings (03:29)
• The sample was tiny (04:50)
• The report wasn’t even available to check (05:55)
• The hidden motives that likely drove this 'research' (06:58)
• The real lesson (09:28)
Video and audio editing: Dominic Armstrong, Milo McGuire, Luke Monsour, and Simon Monsour
Camera operator: Dominic Armstrong
Production: Nick Stockton, Elizabeth Cox, and Katy Moore
