Across the AI industry, high-stakes tools are being deployed in places where errors can harm people: sepsis alerts in hospitals, identity checks, welfare fraud detection, immigration enforcement, and recommendation systems that shape life outcomes. The pattern is familiar: scale and speed go up, while human review becomes rushed, shallow, or punished for disagreeing. In daily work, that can look like a nurse forced to act on false alarms, or a team using an LLM summary in ways the designers never planned. When should you slow down deployment? How do you detect new “wild” use cases early? And what does responsible tracking and oversight look like under real pressure?
Atay Kozlovski is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Zurich’s Center for Ethics. He holds a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Zurich, an MA in PPE from the University of Bern, and a BA from Tel Aviv University. His current research focuses on normative ethics, hard choices, and the ethics of AI.
In the episode, Richie and Atay explore why AI failures keep happening, from automation bias to opaque targeting and hiring models. They unpack “meaningful human control,” accountability, and design in healthcare, government, and warfare. You’ll also hear about deepfakes, consent, digital twins, and AI-driven civic engagement, and much more.
Links Mentioned in the Show:
- “Lavender” IDF recommendation system
- Amnesty International reports on AI/automation in welfare systems
- “Meaningful Human Control” (MHC) framework
- Connect with Atay
- AI-Native Course: Intro to AI for Work
- Related Episode: Harnessing AI to Help Humanity with Sandy Pentland, HAI Fellow at Stanford
- Explore AI-Native Learning on DataCamp
New to DataCamp?
- Learn on the go using the DataCamp mobile app
Empower your business with world-class data and AI skills with DataCamp for business
