Is There a Criticism of the Book?

Five historians said there were factual errors in 16 19. They thought the process was closed and wasn't transparent enough. The beautiful thing about this book is, as journallist,. we usually get one shot. We don't get to come back and really perfect it or ah and to make it better. So i cated the noe criticism. I read more, i studied more, i talked to more historians. Some of the greatest living american historians here review this book. And so those who have it open mind, i think they will have their reservations answered.