The Egregious Conduct of Owen Patterson

He took half a million pounds off two companies, lobbied government. Despite the fact that it is not allowed to lobby ministers on behalf of companies you've taken money from. And all of this is basely down to jacob r smog being a man who would struggle to tie his own shoe laces without the help of his nanny. So let's see owen patterson's egregious conduct as a fairly large rock that has been lobbed in to the political pool. Why is this story so different from all the stories that have gone before? Is it because of the blot what through it? Or is it because of some of the ripples caused by the initial egregious offence?