Robert McCauley is the Kenan University Professor of Philosophy at Emory University with associated appointments in psychology, religion, and anthropology.
In his view, our minds are better suited to religious belief than to scientific inquiry because the explanations that religion provides make intuitive sense to us and engage our natural cognitive systems, while science involves abstract thinking and forms of reflection that require a lot of mental work.
His books include “Hearing Voices and Other Matters of Mind,” and “Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not.”
Greg and Robert discuss a number of topics in this episode including contamination management systems, cognitive fluidity, and developing intuition.
Episode Quotes:
Religions & natural systems
Because these systems are natural, cognitively natural, because they're intuitive, because they're automatic, because they're instantaneous, it just means that folks instantly know how to manage them. They don't need to be taught that God thinks about certain things, certain ways. Or that if he thinks about certain things, certain ways that he must want certain outcomes to, you know, go in one direction as opposed to another. Those are inferences that are just automatic.
On science
Science, it seems to me is something that also has certain cognitively natural dimensions to it.
What is religion
I actually don't offer any definitions of religion. I'm really not interested in definitions of religion, I'm not worried about that. What I'm interested in is cognition and how it Impacts whole host of systems out there in the world that we call “religions.”
Show Links:
Recommended Resources:
Guest Profile:
His Work:
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
