On April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisiana congressional map, holding that racial considerations cannot predominate in the drawing of electoral districts. The ruling narrowed Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by requiring plaintiffs to show intentional discrimination, not just discriminatory effects. In this episode, we explore the Court’s 6-3 decision and what it means for the future of the Voting Rights Act with two leading election law scholars: Edward Foley of The Ohio State University and Michael Morley of Florida State University College of Law. Julie Silverbrook, chief content and learning officer at the National Constitution Center, moderates.
Resources
- Edward Foley, “The Supreme Court’s indefensible evisceration of the Voting Rights Act,” SCOTUSblog, May 5, 2026
- Michael Morley, “Voting Rights Case Sets Stage for 2050’s Multiracial Democracy,” Bloomberg Law, May 6, 2026
-
Louisiana v. Callais (2026)
-
Allen v. Milligan (2023)
-
Robinson v. Ardoin (2022)
-
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021)
-
Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
-
Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)
-
Voting Rights Act (1965)
- National Constitution Center, “The Supreme Court’s Callais decision sets new framework for racial gerrymandering” (April 30, 2026)
- National Constitution Center, Voting Rights Classroom Resources
- National Constitution Center, Elections and Voting in the Constitution (Constitution 101 Curriculum)
Stay Connected and Learn More
Donate
