FedSoc Forums cover image

Revisiting New York Times v. Sullivan

FedSoc Forums

00:00

Social Media Companies Are Essentially Subsidized by the Government

I find it interesting, actuallytat there is a debate about institutional monopolization of attention. It calls to mind old cases like red lion and miami herold versus torneo. I think i would just say that the only argument that you can really defend this with is that the social media companies in particular, are creatures of regulation. They exist only because of section 30. Section two 30 is essentially a colossal subsidy for those industries by freeing them from legal duties they would otherwise efface as any other industry. And so i think people feel, as a result, that they have some right to have something to say it.

Play episode from 47:56
Transcript

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app